Suchergebnisse

Dissent (dissenting opinion) in a case of corruption is a clear disapproval of one or more judges ofthe decisions agreed upon by the majority of the judges who decide cases and is based on thebelief that an independent judge who is seen as a way to realize the independence of judges in ouropinion. Formulation of the problem is 1) Why do I have a difference of opinion (dissentingopinion) among the judges in the panel discussion on corruption cases? 2) How do I judge toresolve differences of opinion in regard corruption cases? 3) What are the implications of thedecision of a dissenting opinion connected with justice and justice for the defendant in a case ofcorruption ?. This type of research is Sosioligis. Source data, Primary and Secondary Data. Datacollection techniques used were interviews and document study. Data were analyzed qualitatively.Conclusion The results of the study 1) there are three factors that cause dissent (dissentingopinion) that is a factor of confidence, feel more true and suspicion factor 2) How to judge resolvedifferences of opinion in the Assembly that the Chairman of the Assembly meetings will be anunderstanding, if not consensus tercapat then deliberation postponed to proceed with the nextdeliberation and if consensus is not reached then the Chairman of the Assembly also would allowjudges dessenter make legal considerations alone 3) the implications of the decision dissentingopinions can be favorable to the accused and can also harm the defendant himself.Keywords : Dissenting Opinion, Resolution, Implications